Categories
Huffington Post (UK) Journalism

The Worst May Be Over

[This article was first published here on The Huffington Post]

Inflation in Asia may have passed or reached its peak this cycle.

In its annual Financial Stability Review released on November 18, the Monetary Authority of Singapore said that while inflation rose for most Asian economies in the first half of the year, the worsening global economic outlook has helped contain inflationnary pressures in October.

“Inflation appears to have peaked in most Asian economies,” the report added.

While six months ago, South Korea was struggling to keep inflation in check, the Bank of Korea kept interest rates frozen for a fifth straight month in November — as Korean consumer inflation slowed to 3.9 percent in October from 5.3 percent in August.

Elsewhere in Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s largest economy, inflation unexpectedly slowed in October, adding to the central bank’s ability to cut interest rates further to boost economic growth.

Vietnam, which is the worst affected nation in Asia on the issue of inflation, too saw inflation slow down for the second month in succession in Oct.

Though the current crisis in Europe does have a bearing on the new figures from Asia, experts say neither the rise in inflation in Asia in the early part of the year nor the subsequent cooling off in Oct. is dependent entirely on the events in the Eurozone.

An International Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Paper (‘Inflation Dynamics in Asia: Causes, Changes, and Spillovers from China’ by Carolina Osorio and D. Filiz Unsal) revealed that more than 60 percent of inflation fluctuations in Asia have a domestic origin.

The contribution of domestic factors is more pronounced for economies that have large domestic demand bases (China, India, and Indonesia) and for those that are more advanced (Japan and Korea).

On the other hand, the Working Paper said, domestic factors account for a lower share of inflation fluctuations in ASEAN economies such as Malaysia and Thailand, which are relatively more open and exposed to global inflationary shocks.

Irrespective of the size of the economy, however, the most fundamental domestic demand of any growing economy is that of food.

According to Rabobank Groep NV, food makes up more than 30 percent of inflation indexes on average in Asia, compared with about 15 percent in Europe and less than 10 percent in the US.

Within Asia, home to 60 percent of the world population, food’s weight in consumer-price indexes varies from about 45 percent in the Philippines and India, to more than 30 percent in China and about 10 percent in South Korea, Rabobank says.

In direct agreement with Rabobank’s finding, the lowering of inflation in China in Oct was in tandem with the event of food costs in the Asian giant, where poor families spend half of their earning to eat, rose by 11.9 per cet in October, down from September’s 13.4 percent.

The sensitivity of their economies to swings in meat and vegetable costs means emerging-market policy makers need to raise interest rates more to stem inflation when global agriculture prices soar.

It is particularly important from a political perspective too as no government can hope to rule a population that is not having enough to eat.

In its annual Asian Development Outlook report (2011), the Asian Development Bank (ADB) warned that inflation, especially if driven by food prices, could exacerbate inequality and lead to social tensions.

In Nepal, for instance, the report suggests that a 20 per cent food price inflation would cause the poverty ratio to rise by over four percentage points, increasing the poor population by more than one million, from the current figure of 6.7 million to 7.7 million.

A development of that nature would end up offering recruits for armed militias fighting against the nation on many fronts.

On the other hand, in China and India, sustained period of inflation presents the ruling establishments the risk of losing the support of the middle class, which may see the only reason of its support to the ruling establishments — prosperity — get washed away by inflation.

Apart from food, an array of factors affects economies in the region in a varied manner.

In Indonesia, government data show that gold jewelry was the biggest contributor to increase in consumer prices in August from the previous month.

Similarly, while gold and gold ornaments account for a mere 0.36 percent in India’s main index, a 52 percent jump in prices in the category was enough to push up the inflation rate in August.

Japan and other Asian economies such as Singapore, Vietnam and Hong Kong did not witness because the metal is either absent from inflation baskets in those countries or jewelry has a limited effect.

Overall, a look back at the 2008 financial crisis shows that many Asian countries are in a better position to respond to another downward spiral now should the need arise. Even though inflation is running too hot for comfort across the region, it is lower now than it was in 2008 for economies like Indonesia and the Philippines.

Changyong Rhee, ADB’s chief economist said, “Developing Asia, having shown resilience throughout the global recession, is now consolidating its recovery and rapid expansion in the region’s two giants — the People’s Republic of China and India — will continue to lift regional and global growth.”

The Asian Development Outlook report (2011) said Asia, barring Japan, would grow by 7.8% in 2011 and 7.7% in 2012, down from 9% in 2010 when the region rebounded strongly from the global financial crisis.

Ironically, Anoop Singh, Director, Asia and Pacific Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF) said in his official blog: “If emerging Asia continues to grow rapidly, this may also lead to higher commodity prices, as demand from the region has become an important driver of many of these prices.”

Clearly, there is neither a simple explanation for inflation in Asia, nor is there an easy fix for fighting it. But with Chinese manufacturing continuing to expand in October and Japan showing signs of coming out of the Tsunami shadow, the region can look forward to build upon the present cooling of inflation.

What should further encourage analysts is the fact that experts like Zhu Jianfang, a Beijing-based economist at Citic Securities, believe that food and global prices have peaked and the inflation figure in the region would only come down in future.

Categories
Reflection

Quote: Legacy

If you think that every life should leave a good name behind, tell me a name that you’ve never forgotten in a day. 


©
 
Anshuman Rawat

Categories
Advt & Mktg Design

Social Media Banner – LeagueofIndia.com

Categories
Logo and Brand Identity

Logo and Brand Identity – League of India

Categories
Foreign Policy Association (US) Journalism

Nepalese Democracy Set for Another Round of Cyclical Chaos

As things stood on the evening of July 26, 20011, Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal’s five-month-old government could collapse by the weekend, thereby giving serious headache to India, which has serious stake in the peace process and drafting of a new constitution. The present Communist Party of Nepal – Unified Marxists Leninists (CPN-UML)-  is Nepal’s fourth government in three years.

Back in February of this year, Khanal had become the Nepalese Prime Minister by pulling the rug from below the feet of his own party leader, Madhav Kumar Nepal after signing a controversial pact with the former Maoist guerrillas to gain their support.

As discussed in an earlier post in this column, it was only on the last day of the expiry of the term of the Constituent Assembly (CA) on May 28, 2011 that Nepal’s key parties had forestalled a major Constitutional crisis and struck a last-minute deal to extend the term of the Constituent Assembly (CA) by three months, under which Prime Minister Jhalanath Khanal would step down for the formation of a national unity govt.

While it was always going to be quite an uphill task to keep the top, warring leaders (Chairman of UCPN-Maoist Prachanda, President of NC Sushil Koirala and Chairman of CPN-UML Jhalanath Khanal) from going for the jugular, what triggered the present impasse is UML’s decision of a reshuffle of ministers in the Prime Minister’ cabinet. In place of Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Krishna Bahadur Mahara, the Maoist central committee meeting yesterday nominated Narayan Kaji Shrestha, vice president of the party, to lead its ministerial team with the portfolio of Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister. The party has been seeking to reshuffle the cabinet, replacing their party men with a new list of 24 ministers since Monday (July 25).

However, Khanal, who heads the United Marxist Leninists Party but is dubbed as ‘half-Maoist and half-UML leader’ by his own party colleagues, refused point-blank to the demand and made it clear that he would rather resign than swear in any new ministers in the cabinet.

On the other hand, the party was clear in its stand: “We have given him time until 8 AM Wednesday,” disclosed Vice Chairman Narayan Kaji Shrestha of Unified Maoists.

At the same time, Nepal’s main opposition party, the Nepal Congress (NC) has now been obstructing the parliament for the last two days, demanding resignation of the Prime Minister. NC asserts that the nomination of new ministers by the Maoist party is gross violation of the five point deal (towards formation of a new constitution).

Speaker Subas Nembang had to adjourn the House meeting as NC lawmakers continued their protests despite his request to allow House proceedings. As a consequence, the Parliament failed to consider bills or conduct other business during the week.

Speaking in parliament, NC’s deputy parliamentary party leader Prakashman Singh said, “The PM had signed the five-point agreement admitting the fact that the government had failed to make progress in the peace process and constitution writing. So, he must step down.”

In a meeting of the top leadership of the major three political parties, the NC objected to yesterday’s endorsement by the Maoist Central Committee’s of the proposal put forth by UML Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal on peace, statute and organizational – including cabinet – reshuffling.

Signaling tough days ahead for the parliament, the NC central committee has announced that the party would continue to obstruct the parliament until PM Khanal tenders his resignation. “Until environment becomes favorable we will continue to obstruct the parliament,” said NC Vice President Ram Chandra Poudel.

Critics of India, which are in significant numbers in the Himalayan nation, leave out no opportunity to point out that the current NC rigidity coincides with the visit of NC President Koirala’s to India – thereby implying that the impasse is (at least partly) created by India.

However, while PM Khanal would not have lost sleep over NC’s protests, the fact that the Maoists, whose support only he had managed to gain, are now hostile towards him for his refusal to reshuffle the cabinet means that resignation may be the only option left for him. In the process, he may also answer media and opposition criticism of him being a mere puppet in the hands of the Maoists.

And sure enough, the desire of the belligerent-by-the-day Maoists to rule the nation either directly or by proxy comes through the statement of Unified Maoists’ Barsa Man Pun: “After Khanal resigns we will take needed actions to form a new government under our own command.”

Quite poignantly for Nepal, the fall of the Jhala Nath Khanal government – irrespective of all its political ramifications – is the least of the worries for the Nepalese people. The biggest issue for them would be the unveiling of a new constitution. As per the 5-point agreement, the government would dissolve anyway if the new constitution does not come into being by the end of August. And since Nepal has already missed two earlier deadlines by which it was to arrive at a new constitution, the Supreme Court of Nepal has “discouraged the government” from seeking yet another extension.

Even a kid on the streets of Kathmandu would tell you that PM Khanal would not be able to get the new constitution ready by next month. Nor would he be able to discharge the Maoists’ guerrilla army, whose nearly 20,000 combatants remain a major concern for the future of democracy in the country.

All of the aforementioned uncertainty is taking a toll on the country’s economy – especially in the form of trade with India. India bashing may be the order of the day in some circles during the current volatile political climate, but what should worry even them is that the Indian investment in Nepal is now at its lowest since the last five years. It is a relationship that the Himalayan nation can barely allow to deteriorate.

Unless the final aim is to facilitate Maoists’ sitting in China’s lap.

Categories
Huffington Post (UK) Journalism

Hat-Trick Boy Stuart Broad Brings England Right Back

A little after Rahul Dravid reached his 34th test hundred on the second day of the India-England test match at Trent Bridge, Nottingham, Alan Wilkins expressed his gentle displeasure to fellow commentator Ravi Shastri about the nickname ‘Wall’ given to the Indian batsman. “A wall can be brought down”, he argued – thereby implying that Rahul Dravid can’t be.

And yet, if you were to be in India these days, you would have thought that it is neither victory in the series nor the safeguarding of the No. 1 Test team status, but the 100th international century by Sachin Tendulkar is all that matters to Indians. Unfortunately, it may well be true in some sections of the so-called cricket-literate nation.

But Rahul Dravid, just as VVS Laxman, is used to being in the shadow of Tendulkar. In fact, he would rather not have any other way; just as India would rather not have any other man at the crease when the chips are down, than the ‘Wall’ himself. (Sorry Alan, but I guess it’s tad too late in the day to change the nickname. If you wish, he is known as ‘Jammy’ within the team.)

After yesterday’s late counter-attack by Stuart Broad with the bat and the first-ball wicket of Abhinav Mukund by James Anderson, the test match seemed evenly poised at stumps last evening. However, as has happened many a times in the last decade, Laxman and Dravid the steadied the ship and started taking the game away from England this morning – till Laxman perished behind the stumps on a Bresnan beauty.

But while the crowd favourite Sachin came and went early, along with Suresh Raina, Dravid stayed well at the crease and went ahead to score yet another important century for the team.

And yet, the highlight of the day was to come later in the day. In a maniacal period of about 20 minutes, India lost 5 wickets for mere 8 runs. After getting Yuvraj Singh caught behind in the 85th over of the Indian innings, England’s man of the moment Stuart Broad wrecked havoc with a deserving-yet-dubious (owing to Harbhajan being wrongly given out) hat-trick in the 88th over. After bowling two dots, Broad got Indian skipper MS Dhoni caught in the slips on the 3rd ball, caught Harbhajan Singh LBW on the 4rth ball and bowled Praveen Kumar on the 5th, before bringing some sanity to the proceedings with a dot ball.

It was the kind of over that could potentially change the complexion of the whole test match. It certainly changed Dravid’s composure, as in the very next over, he got caught at the third man of Bresnan, while trying to do a Sehwag while upper-cutting a rather innocuous ball. He made 117, typically fighting runs.

A little later, Broad completed his demolition job by getting Ishant Sharma caught by Ian Bell. Broad finished the day with scintillating figures of 6 for 46! Add to that the fact that he was the top scorer with the bat too. Yesterday, he had remarked that he felt good answering the critics. After today, he might have to search hard for critics.

To put things into perspective, this was not only Broad’s personal best bowling figures and the 10th best ever by an English bowler against India, but also the first hat-trick against India by an English bowler! The most recent performance of such impact by and English bowler against India was 21 years, by Ian Botham in 1980. Now that the great all-rounder’s protégé Andrew Flintoff has retired, should England already consider Stuart Broad the next Ian Botham? Hmmm!

On the other side of the crease, after looking like building a substantial lead during the 128-run partnership between Dravid and Yuvraj, India ended with just 288, enjoying a lead of 67 runs. However, it is a low-scoring match and the pitch and conditions are still favouring swing bowlers. So, 67-run lead might prove to be a handy one – especially in the light of the fact that injured Jonnathan Trott not likely to bat. He had injured his shoulder while trying to stop a ball today.

Sure enough, the lead started looking handy almost immediately after the England 2nd innings began. Alistair Cook continued his extraordinarily poor run at the crease, as he got out on 5, caught by Yuvraj at point on an Ishant Sharma ball, which he was trying to play towards mid-wicket!

When the frantic day finally ended, Andrew Strauss and Ian Bell were at the crease, with England still 43 runs behind India.

It is going to be difficult to wait till tomorrow!

Score at Stumps on the 2nd Day:

England 1st Innings: 221 all out (Stuart Broad 64, Andrew Strauss 32; Praveen Kumar 3/45, Ishant Sharma 3/66, S Sreesanth 3/77)
India 1st Innings: 288 (Rahul Dravid 150, Yuvraj Singh 62, VVS Laxman 54; Stuart Broad 6/46, Tim Bresnan 2/48)
England 2nd Innings: 24/1 (Andrew Strauss 6*, Ian Bell 9*; Ishant Sharma 1/9)